{ad_business_name}

Silhouette of a family with a member with autism walking.

Brenda's Autism Blog

“If Only…” Autism And The Blame Game

   

Not one, but two of today's news items provide possible clues as to what could cause Autism...  "Less Folic Acid In Pregnancy Tied To Autism". Whew - I'm good on that one, I think to myself as I read, recalling my daily struggles to swallow those horsepills both pre- and post-conception for both of my pregnancies. (I'm the WORST pill-swallower!) But uh oh... I'm feeling not-so-great about the next article, "Antidepressants In Fish Trigger Autism Genes In Fish". Here, scientists cite contamination of our water supply by medication as being responsible for causing Autism. If only I stuck with bottled water, I chastize myself. But wait; are those same chemicals in bottled water too? Before I can figure that one out, I read the article's footnote and learn that it may be irrelevant. "This article was first posted under a different headline. It has been changed to emphasise that the finding concern fish, not humans." Okay, I'm a human, not a fish; so I may be off the hook here too.

But there's still that research study from two years ago that sticks in my mind about mothers living near freeways having double the risk of having a child with Autism. When my husband and I embarked on our lives together almost twenty years ago, we bought a cute little starter home on the outskirts of a great neighborhood in Toronto. It had everything we were looking for – three bedrooms, a master ensuite, great backyard, and it was in our price range. There was only one drawback. You guessed it... It was a stone's throw from the 401, one of the widest and busiest highways in North America.

And then there's the study revealing that mothers who had fevers during their pregnancies are more than twice as likely to have children with Autism or developmental delays compared to mothers of normally developing children. I can't even recall being sick when I was pregnant with Michael, my beautiful 17-year old son who was diagnosed with Autism just before his third birthday. My husband, whose memory is much better than mine, remembers that I was sick with a fever for a few days. The study advises that "pregnant women who develop fever take anti-pyretic medications and seek medical attention if their fever persists." I know how anti-medication I was during pregnancy, in my efforts to protect my unborn children. Did I take anything to bring my fever down when I was pregnant with Michael? I honestly can't recall.

There are many, many more studies that point to possible causes of Autism, from obesity during pregnancy to fathers being older. And, I think it is safe to assume that there will be many, many more. For this, I am grateful. While all of this research may not help Michael, it could change the lives of his future nieces, nephews and the countless other yet unborn individuals who, without these ongoing scientific pursuits, would be subject to today's terrifying 1 in 88 Autism prevalency rate.

When a parent receives a diagnosis of Autism, it is very easy to fall into the trap of self-blame. Thanks to Leo Kanner, for decades mothers blamed themselves for their children's Autism and it was widely accepted that Autism was caused by a mother's failure to emotionally bond with her child. (To my utter amazement, this is still going on in France but that's a whole other story.) We now know with 100 per cent certainty that our parenting abilities have absolutely nothing whatsover to do with our children's diagnoses. But what about all of these research studies that keep popping up, suggesting possible ways in which our lives and our children's could have been drastically different had we done, or not done, something different?

The rational side of me knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that I was very careful during my pregnancy. Then and now, I'd do anything to protect my children. But life throws its curves at us, and we can't go back in time to undo what has been done. For the most part, I guess I've faced my demons. But every so often, like this morning when I began purusing the Autism-related news of the day, I couldn't help asking myself "What if...?"

Have Your Say On How Autism Should Be Defined!

 

autism, definition, diagnostic and statistical manual, dsm-4, dsm-5, autistic, asperger'sThe very definition of Autism has been a matter of great debate as of late with the impending publication of The American Psychiatric Association's (APA) fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). DSM is the handbook used by health care professionals as an authoritative guide to the diagnosis of mental disorders.

My previous blog on the subject, which I continue to update with current information, reveals that many parents and professionals alike are worried about the potential ramifications of the Association's proposed changes. Many are concerned that funding eligibility will be compromised. Others question what will become of those individuals currently diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome, or Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, as both diagnoses would no longer exist under the proposed revisions.

Have your say!

For a third and final time, the APA issued a press release, inviting members of the public to submit feedback about the proposed changes. A review of the modified diagnostic criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder can be found on the APA's DSM-5 Development website, and comments can be submitted online. Note that the deadline for submissions is June 15, 2012.

What's your opinion?

We'd love to hear your feedback too! Submit your commentary here, or on our Facebook page!

 

Proposed Changes to the DSM


The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders is published by the American Psychiatric Association and is used by clinicians and psychiatrists to diagnose psychiatric illnesses in adults and children, including Autism. Currently in its fourth edition, the Manual has not undergone a major revision in 17 years. However, an expert panel has been appointed by the Association to reassess the publication, which has many concerned. Modifications are expected to narrow the criteria for Autism which could have a huge impact on individuals' abilities to access Autism-specific funding, resources and insurance benefits.

Click here for a press release issued on January 20, 2012 by the American Psychological Association on the proposed criteria changes.

Click here for a press release issued on May 2, 2012 by the American Psychological Association inviting public comment on the proposed criteria for the upcoming fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).

Be sure to check back to this page often for ongoing updates on this important change to the definition of "Autism".

     
Autism And Asperger’s In The DSM-V: Thoughts On Clinical Utility Feb. 15, 2010
Some Experts Worried Over Revised Autism Guidelines Dec. 28, 2012
New Definition of Autism Will Exclude Many, Study Suggests Jan. 19, 2012
Proposed Changes Of Autism Definition Does Not Sit Well With The Autism Community Jan. 19, 2012
Proposed Changes To Autism Definition May Mean New Diagnoses For People With Asperger's Jan. 20, 2012
Plan To Change Autism Definition Has Some Worried Jan. 20, 2012
Autism Diagnosis Change: What Does It Mean? Jan. 20, 2012
Diagnosis Changes Worry Autism Advocates Jan. 21, 2012
New Proposed Autism Definition Could Include Fewer People Jan. 21, 2012
The Autism Controversy Revisited Jan. 22, 2012
How Will the DSM V Changes in Autism Affect People? Jan. 23, 2012
APA Considers New Definition For Autism, A Change That Could Limit Kids’ Access To Special Education Jan. 23, 2012
Why The Definition Of Autism Matters Jan. 24, 2012
Parents Worry About New Autism Criteria Jan. 24, 2012
Psychiatric Group Push to Redefine Mental Illness Sparks Revolt Jan. 24, 2012
Parents Worry About Redefinition Of Autism Jan. 25, 2012
Parents Have Good Reason to Fear the Redefining of Autism Jan. 27, 2012
Redefining Autism: Will New DSM-5 Criteria for ASD Exclude Some People? Jan. 30, 2012
Student With Asperger’s Syndrome Speaks Against Changing Definition Of Autism Jan. 31, 2012
Autism Speaks Statement on Proposed Revisions to the DSM Definition of Autism Spectrum Disorder Feb. 2, 2012
Revised Autism Definition Too Important to Rush Into Print: View

 

Feb. 6, 2012
Asperger’s, Overdiagnosed, Ill Defined, May Not Be a Syndrome Much Longer Feb. 7, 2012
Parents Of Autistic Kids Fear Diagnostic Changes Will Mean Reduced Services Feb. 12, 2012
Doctors Want To Redefine Autism; Some Parents Worry Their Children Will Be Denied Special Ed April 5, 2012
Doctors Want To Redefine Autism; Parents Worried April 5, 2012
 
Doctors Want To Redefine Autism; Parents Worried April 6, 2012
Findings from DSM-5 Field Testing May 8, 2012
The Changing Spectrum Of Autism May 16, 2012
The Proposed DSM-5 Will Result In Far Fewer Persons Being Diagnosed With Autism, Predicts New Study May 16, 2012
New Report Finds DSM-5 Criteria Unlikely To Exclude Many May 24, 2012
DSM-5 Update: Autism Speaks' Letter to the Revision Committee June 11, 2012  

 1 2 >